Philips 34M2C5601QA vs Sony INZONE M9
Philips 34M2C5601QA
34″ · 3440×1440 · 200 Hz · Fast VASony INZONE M9
27″ · 3840×2160 · 144 Hz · IPSPhilips 34M2C5601QA and Sony INZONE M9 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 79 and 78.
- Resolution: Sony INZONE M9 leads (3840×2160 vs 3440×1440).
- Refresh rate: Philips 34M2C5601QA leads (200 Hz vs 144 Hz).
Philips 34M2C5601QA
If you care most about refresh rate.
Sony INZONE M9
If you care most about resolution.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| Philips 34M2C5601QA | Sony INZONE M9 | |
|---|---|---|
| 79 | Gear score | 78 |
| 34″ | Screen size | 27″ |
| 3440×1440 | Resolution | 3840×2160 |
| 200 Hz | Refresh rate | 144 Hz |
| Fast VA | Panel | IPS |
| 1 ms | Response time | — |
| — | Estimated price | ≈ $900 |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is Philips 34M2C5601QA or Sony INZONE M9 better?
Philips 34M2C5601QA and Sony INZONE M9 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 79 and 78. Resolution: Sony INZONE M9 leads (3840×2160 vs 3440×1440). Refresh rate: Philips 34M2C5601QA leads (200 Hz vs 144 Hz).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: Philips 34M2C5601QA leads (200 Hz vs 144 Hz).