Achieva QH2700-IPSMS DP Thunderbolt Perfect Pixel vs AOC Q3279VWF
Achieva QH2700-IPSMS DP Thunderbolt Perfect Pixel
27″ · 2560×1440 · 60 Hz · IPSAOC Q3279VWF
31.5″ · 2560×1440 · 75 Hz · VAAchieva QH2700-IPSMS DP Thunderbolt Perfect Pixel and AOC Q3279VWF are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 52 and 52.
- Refresh rate: AOC Q3279VWF leads (75 Hz vs 60 Hz).
AOC Q3279VWF
If you care most about refresh rate.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| Achieva QH2700-IPSMS DP Thunderbolt Perfect Pixel | AOC Q3279VWF | |
|---|---|---|
| 52 | Gear score | 52 |
| 27″ | Screen size | 31.5″ |
| 2560×1440 | Resolution | 2560×1440 |
| 60 Hz | Refresh rate | 75 Hz |
| IPS | Panel | VA |
| — | Response time | 5 ms |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is Achieva QH2700-IPSMS DP Thunderbolt Perfect Pixel or AOC Q3279VWF better?
Achieva QH2700-IPSMS DP Thunderbolt Perfect Pixel and AOC Q3279VWF are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 52 and 52. Refresh rate: AOC Q3279VWF leads (75 Hz vs 60 Hz).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: AOC Q3279VWF leads (75 Hz vs 60 Hz).