ASUS CG32UQ vs CTL MTIP2781
ASUS CG32UQ
31.5″ · 3840×2160 · 60 Hz · VACTL MTIP2781
27″ · 2560×1440 · 75 Hz · IPSASUS CG32UQ and CTL MTIP2781 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 54 and 54.
- Resolution: ASUS CG32UQ leads (3840×2160 vs 2560×1440).
- Refresh rate: CTL MTIP2781 leads (75 Hz vs 60 Hz).
- Response time: ASUS CG32UQ leads (5 ms vs 7 ms).
ASUS CG32UQ
If you care most about resolution, response time.
CTL MTIP2781
If you care most about refresh rate.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| ASUS CG32UQ | CTL MTIP2781 | |
|---|---|---|
| 54 | Gear score | 54 |
| 31.5″ | Screen size | 27″ |
| 3840×2160 | Resolution | 2560×1440 |
| 60 Hz | Refresh rate | 75 Hz |
| VA | Panel | IPS |
| 5 ms | Response time | 7 ms |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is ASUS CG32UQ or CTL MTIP2781 better?
ASUS CG32UQ and CTL MTIP2781 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 54 and 54. Resolution: ASUS CG32UQ leads (3840×2160 vs 2560×1440). Refresh rate: CTL MTIP2781 leads (75 Hz vs 60 Hz). Response time: ASUS CG32UQ leads (5 ms vs 7 ms).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: CTL MTIP2781 leads (75 Hz vs 60 Hz).