ASUS ProArt Display PA34VCNV vs CTL MTIP2781
ASUS ProArt Display PA34VCNV
34.1″ · 3440×1440 · 60 Hz · IPSCTL MTIP2781
27″ · 2560×1440 · 75 Hz · IPSASUS ProArt Display PA34VCNV and CTL MTIP2781 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 54 and 54.
- Resolution: ASUS ProArt Display PA34VCNV leads (3440×1440 vs 2560×1440).
- Refresh rate: CTL MTIP2781 leads (75 Hz vs 60 Hz).
- Response time: ASUS ProArt Display PA34VCNV leads (5 ms vs 7 ms).
ASUS ProArt Display PA34VCNV
If you care most about resolution, response time.
CTL MTIP2781
If you care most about refresh rate.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| ASUS ProArt Display PA34VCNV | CTL MTIP2781 | |
|---|---|---|
| 54 | Gear score | 54 |
| 34.1″ | Screen size | 27″ |
| 3440×1440 | Resolution | 2560×1440 |
| 60 Hz | Refresh rate | 75 Hz |
| IPS | Panel | IPS |
| 5 ms | Response time | 7 ms |
| ≈ $640 | Estimated price | — |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is ASUS ProArt Display PA34VCNV or CTL MTIP2781 better?
ASUS ProArt Display PA34VCNV and CTL MTIP2781 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 54 and 54. Resolution: ASUS ProArt Display PA34VCNV leads (3440×1440 vs 2560×1440). Refresh rate: CTL MTIP2781 leads (75 Hz vs 60 Hz). Response time: ASUS ProArt Display PA34VCNV leads (5 ms vs 7 ms).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: CTL MTIP2781 leads (75 Hz vs 60 Hz).