BenQ SW271C vs CTL MTIP2781
BenQ SW271C
27″ · 3840×2160 · 60 Hz · Mini LEDCTL MTIP2781
27″ · 2560×1440 · 75 Hz · IPSBenQ SW271C and CTL MTIP2781 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 54 and 54.
- Resolution: BenQ SW271C leads (3840×2160 vs 2560×1440).
- Refresh rate: CTL MTIP2781 leads (75 Hz vs 60 Hz).
- Response time: BenQ SW271C leads (5 ms vs 7 ms).
BenQ SW271C
If you care most about resolution, response time.
CTL MTIP2781
If you care most about refresh rate.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| BenQ SW271C | CTL MTIP2781 | |
|---|---|---|
| 54 | Gear score | 54 |
| 27″ | Screen size | 27″ |
| 3840×2160 | Resolution | 2560×1440 |
| 60 Hz | Refresh rate | 75 Hz |
| Mini LED | Panel | IPS |
| 5 ms | Response time | 7 ms |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is BenQ SW271C or CTL MTIP2781 better?
BenQ SW271C and CTL MTIP2781 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 54 and 54. Resolution: BenQ SW271C leads (3840×2160 vs 2560×1440). Refresh rate: CTL MTIP2781 leads (75 Hz vs 60 Hz). Response time: BenQ SW271C leads (5 ms vs 7 ms).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: CTL MTIP2781 leads (75 Hz vs 60 Hz).