BenQ PD3420Q vs CTL MTIP2781
BenQ PD3420Q
34″ · 3440×1440 · 60 Hz · IPSCTL MTIP2781
27″ · 2560×1440 · 75 Hz · IPSBenQ PD3420Q and CTL MTIP2781 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 54 and 54.
- Resolution: BenQ PD3420Q leads (3440×1440 vs 2560×1440).
- Refresh rate: CTL MTIP2781 leads (75 Hz vs 60 Hz).
- Response time: BenQ PD3420Q leads (5 ms vs 7 ms).
BenQ PD3420Q
If you care most about resolution, response time.
CTL MTIP2781
If you care most about refresh rate.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| BenQ PD3420Q | CTL MTIP2781 | |
|---|---|---|
| 54 | Gear score | 54 |
| 34″ | Screen size | 27″ |
| 3440×1440 | Resolution | 2560×1440 |
| 60 Hz | Refresh rate | 75 Hz |
| IPS | Panel | IPS |
| 5 ms | Response time | 7 ms |
| ≈ $800 | Estimated price | — |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is BenQ PD3420Q or CTL MTIP2781 better?
BenQ PD3420Q and CTL MTIP2781 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 54 and 54. Resolution: BenQ PD3420Q leads (3440×1440 vs 2560×1440). Refresh rate: CTL MTIP2781 leads (75 Hz vs 60 Hz). Response time: BenQ PD3420Q leads (5 ms vs 7 ms).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: CTL MTIP2781 leads (75 Hz vs 60 Hz).