BenQ GW2490 vs CTL MTIP2781
BenQ GW2490
23.8″ · 1920×1080 · 100 Hz · IPSCTL MTIP2781
27″ · 2560×1440 · 75 Hz · IPSBenQ GW2490 and CTL MTIP2781 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 54 and 54.
- Resolution: CTL MTIP2781 leads (2560×1440 vs 1920×1080).
- Refresh rate: BenQ GW2490 leads (100 Hz vs 75 Hz).
- Response time: BenQ GW2490 leads (5 ms vs 7 ms).
BenQ GW2490
If you care most about refresh rate, response time.
CTL MTIP2781
If you care most about resolution.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| BenQ GW2490 | CTL MTIP2781 | |
|---|---|---|
| 54 | Gear score | 54 |
| 23.8″ | Screen size | 27″ |
| 1920×1080 | Resolution | 2560×1440 |
| 100 Hz | Refresh rate | 75 Hz |
| IPS | Panel | IPS |
| 5 ms | Response time | 7 ms |
| ≈ $115 | Estimated price | — |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is BenQ GW2490 or CTL MTIP2781 better?
BenQ GW2490 and CTL MTIP2781 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 54 and 54. Resolution: CTL MTIP2781 leads (2560×1440 vs 1920×1080). Refresh rate: BenQ GW2490 leads (100 Hz vs 75 Hz). Response time: BenQ GW2490 leads (5 ms vs 7 ms).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: BenQ GW2490 leads (100 Hz vs 75 Hz).