ASUS ROG Swift PG65UQ vs HP Omen 32c
ASUS ROG Swift PG65UQ
64.5″ · 3840×2160 · 144 Hz · VAHP Omen 32c
31.5″ · 2560×1440 · 165 Hz · VAASUS ROG Swift PG65UQ and HP Omen 32c are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 73 and 73.
- Resolution: ASUS ROG Swift PG65UQ leads (3840×2160 vs 2560×1440).
- Refresh rate: HP Omen 32c leads (165 Hz vs 144 Hz).
- Response time: HP Omen 32c leads (1 ms vs 4 ms).
ASUS ROG Swift PG65UQ
If you care most about resolution.
HP Omen 32c
If you care most about refresh rate, response time.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| ASUS ROG Swift PG65UQ | HP Omen 32c | |
|---|---|---|
| 73 | Gear score | 73 |
| 64.5″ | Screen size | 31.5″ |
| 3840×2160 | Resolution | 2560×1440 |
| 144 Hz | Refresh rate | 165 Hz |
| VA | Panel | VA |
| 4 ms | Response time | 1 ms |
| — | Estimated price | ≈ $320 |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is ASUS ROG Swift PG65UQ or HP Omen 32c better?
ASUS ROG Swift PG65UQ and HP Omen 32c are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 73 and 73. Resolution: ASUS ROG Swift PG65UQ leads (3840×2160 vs 2560×1440). Refresh rate: HP Omen 32c leads (165 Hz vs 144 Hz). Response time: HP Omen 32c leads (1 ms vs 4 ms).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: HP Omen 32c leads (165 Hz vs 144 Hz).